Christian Brights is a brand new group that I've started, a parallel group to Christian Objectivists.
Click here to find out what a Christian Bright is, and whether you are one already! This will take you to the blog called "Christian Brights." There you can find out about this, and you can even take two little bitty tests to find out if you belong. Cheers!
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
History of Christian Objectivism
Christian objectivism had its beginnings in January, 2000, in a house in Baraboo, Wisconsin, where a family of Christians (the youngest child being 18, the oldest 20) all read Atlas Shrugged and, in addition to having their lives immediately changed as if moving from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance, they each independently concluded that many of the tenets set forth in Atlas Shrugged (Ayn Rand's Objectivism), were substantially the same tenets they perceived as being the foundations of Christianity, as they, themselves, understood Christianity.
That was my family, and we realized immediately that a proper combination of Christianity with the concept of objectivism would create a philosophical system that reflected our deepest convictions.
Of this initial group, my daughter Sarah Saturday--now a Los Angeles computer consultant and designer, and a musician--and myself--an attorney and former columnist for The New York Times Syndicate, and founder/director of a non-profit legal corporation--began in-depth discussions, and I began my formal work on the development of the tenets that would express the new philosophical system named Christian objectivism.
Gradually, I completed the treatise setting out the new philosophy of Christian objectivism, and we began hosting in-house and online groups to discuss the new philosophy's applications. The first-ever online appearance of the new philosophy and its name was in a Yahoo chat group set up by Sarah soon thereafter. A discussion group, hosted by Sarah, is still active today, in which Christian, atheists, Randian Objectivists, and everyone in between, hold lively exchanges. (You may join that group by--let me look into how to create that link for you here.)
As would be expected, Randian Objectivists (Objectivists who subscribed strictly to Rand's version of the philosophy of objectivism) have had strong reactions against the group, ranging from laughter to vigorous verbal attack, most asserting that Objectivism as set forth by Rand was utterly incompatible with Christianity.
A disambiguation was in order early on.
I have explained that the name "Christian objectivism" had been chosen for reasons other than to cling like robots or remora to the version of the philosophy of objectivism that Rand had homesteaded and named Objectivism (for clarity, in this document, Objectivism with a capital "o" refers to Rand's Objectivism, and objectivism with a small "o" refers to the general philosophy of objectivism that preceded Rand's version.) Christian objectivism was not a system built to hide in the skirts of any pre-existing system, or to grow from it, as an offshoot. Rather, Christian objectivism would be an entirely new, fully original, and independently-standing structure.
Therefore, I had no hesitation about asserting that the second word of the name of the philosophy would be "objectivism", as this term most sharply reflected my certainty that truth was objective. And since it is my position--shared by Saturday-- that Christianity is true, then Christianity's truth must also be objective.
So, while Rand's writings about her own Objectivism had profoundly affected and excited my family and had opened our minds more fully than ever to the concept of objective truth, it was nonetheless gallopingly clear that Rand, an atheist, had not delineated her philosophy in such a way as to leave room for theist variants, and I was not attempting to crash that party.
That was not to say, however, that vast areas of Christian objectivism and of Rand's Objectivism--both taking the same view of the nature of truth--did not overlap, and there was no attempt to disguise that fact in my treatise on the new philosophy.
In fact, Christian objectivism, by consistently discussing Rand's Objectivist writings, especially the similarities and differences between the two philosophies, had, in effect, intentionally set up residence in close proximity to Rand's philosophy, establishing only very meager fencing between the two, for the simple reason that truth, being objective, obviously had bedrooms in both houses and should be able to move freely between the two establishments, like a child in custody of parents who share his biology but who have enough irreconcilable differences to keep them from being housemates.
A series of essays will be posted on here beginning in September, in which my treatise on Christian objectivism will be published in segmented installments. A book-length treatise will be published thereafter.
That was my family, and we realized immediately that a proper combination of Christianity with the concept of objectivism would create a philosophical system that reflected our deepest convictions.
Of this initial group, my daughter Sarah Saturday--now a Los Angeles computer consultant and designer, and a musician--and myself--an attorney and former columnist for The New York Times Syndicate, and founder/director of a non-profit legal corporation--began in-depth discussions, and I began my formal work on the development of the tenets that would express the new philosophical system named Christian objectivism.
Gradually, I completed the treatise setting out the new philosophy of Christian objectivism, and we began hosting in-house and online groups to discuss the new philosophy's applications. The first-ever online appearance of the new philosophy and its name was in a Yahoo chat group set up by Sarah soon thereafter. A discussion group, hosted by Sarah, is still active today, in which Christian, atheists, Randian Objectivists, and everyone in between, hold lively exchanges. (You may join that group by--let me look into how to create that link for you here.)
As would be expected, Randian Objectivists (Objectivists who subscribed strictly to Rand's version of the philosophy of objectivism) have had strong reactions against the group, ranging from laughter to vigorous verbal attack, most asserting that Objectivism as set forth by Rand was utterly incompatible with Christianity.
A disambiguation was in order early on.
I have explained that the name "Christian objectivism" had been chosen for reasons other than to cling like robots or remora to the version of the philosophy of objectivism that Rand had homesteaded and named Objectivism (for clarity, in this document, Objectivism with a capital "o" refers to Rand's Objectivism, and objectivism with a small "o" refers to the general philosophy of objectivism that preceded Rand's version.) Christian objectivism was not a system built to hide in the skirts of any pre-existing system, or to grow from it, as an offshoot. Rather, Christian objectivism would be an entirely new, fully original, and independently-standing structure.
Therefore, I had no hesitation about asserting that the second word of the name of the philosophy would be "objectivism", as this term most sharply reflected my certainty that truth was objective. And since it is my position--shared by Saturday-- that Christianity is true, then Christianity's truth must also be objective.
So, while Rand's writings about her own Objectivism had profoundly affected and excited my family and had opened our minds more fully than ever to the concept of objective truth, it was nonetheless gallopingly clear that Rand, an atheist, had not delineated her philosophy in such a way as to leave room for theist variants, and I was not attempting to crash that party.
That was not to say, however, that vast areas of Christian objectivism and of Rand's Objectivism--both taking the same view of the nature of truth--did not overlap, and there was no attempt to disguise that fact in my treatise on the new philosophy.
In fact, Christian objectivism, by consistently discussing Rand's Objectivist writings, especially the similarities and differences between the two philosophies, had, in effect, intentionally set up residence in close proximity to Rand's philosophy, establishing only very meager fencing between the two, for the simple reason that truth, being objective, obviously had bedrooms in both houses and should be able to move freely between the two establishments, like a child in custody of parents who share his biology but who have enough irreconcilable differences to keep them from being housemates.
A series of essays will be posted on here beginning in September, in which my treatise on Christian objectivism will be published in segmented installments. A book-length treatise will be published thereafter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
